In the 210 horn will not the 515B give the best of both worlds in terms of midrange and LF extension?
There were at least 2 versions of 515E, finding 4 that match would be a challenge, and that takes us back to truncating frames which i have no problem doing to the low interest drivers like flat mag 515E. But the 515E with the cast backplate seems to hold a much higher resale value, and i'd hate to destroy that value by chopping them up.
The other option would be "if" GPA can build them(515E) up, which i have doubts about as well. I expect new GPA product would be 515G. Beyond that, market value on 515E's would make building new ones a very poor investment from a cost/value perspective.
OTOH, if i were to commission GPA to build 4 new alnico 515B on old style 15 inch frames, i think their value in the "inter-market" will always equal if not exceed the initial cost.
See how tempting it is to go with a non-Altec woofer in this application?
This is truly the biggest caveat, and it kills their value among the majority of the potential market. It makes a lot of people cringe. I can't really blame them as they KNOW it's not supposed to look like that.I think they look terrible.
While every word is true here, the modification in question is almost inconsequential. The weakest point on a new style 16 inch frame is where the motor bolts to it, and this is where the vast majority of frame damage/failure occurs. Just ask the board member who found most of his 421 motors laying in the bottom of his 817 cabinets after having them trucked home from an event.Whenever you cut into a frame on anything you are compromising it's integrity. Uncut frames could easily be bent from shipping,in proper torquing of the bolts to the baffle,etc.... Let alone cut ones.![]()









, truncated JBL frames are the ONLY frames i've ever seen damaged in shipping. There's no question that they're more fragile. But, in certain designs it is a necessary compromise to overcome edge diffraction and lobing/comb filtering.

Bookmarks